[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-1487:
-----------------------------------


Is this Filter really needed anymore?

If yes, why not create an FieldCacheRangeFilter that can handle any data type 
from FieldCache:

- FieldCacheRangeFilter.newTermRange()
- FieldCacheRangeFilter.newByteRange()
- FieldCacheRangeFilter.newShortRange()
- FieldCacheRangeFilter.newIntRange()
- ...

> FieldCacheTermsFilter
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1487
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Tim Sturge
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: FieldCacheTermsFilter.java, FieldCacheTermsFilter.java, 
> LUCENE-1487.patch
>
>
> This is a companion to FieldCacheRangeFilter except it operates on a set of 
> terms rather than a range. It works best when the set is comparatively large 
> or the terms are comparatively common.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to