Yonik, did that mail went to the wrong mailing-list?! Seems like you aimed to send to a solr list.
simon On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Yonik Seeley<yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > For the next release cycle (presumably 1.5?) I think we should really > try to stick to released versions of Lucene, and not use dev/trunk > versions. > Early in Solr's lifetime, Lucene trunk was more stable (APIs changed > little, even on non-released versions), and Lucene releases were few > and far between. > Today, the pace of change in Lucene has quickened, and Lucene APIs are > much more in flux until a release is made. It's also now harder to > support a Lucene dev release given the growth in complexity > (particularly for indexing code). Releases are made more often too, > making using released versions more practical. > Many of our users dislike our use of dev versions of Lucene too. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
