yeah, its fixed now.

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Michael
McCandless<luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Is this the native vs LF svn:eol-style that Uwe already fixed?
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Shai Erera<ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can somebody try to revert the change and test it on Windows?
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> well then I have no idea why it doesn't fail. Except that perhaps its
>>> EOL-related (as Shai said), and that the failure is somehow
>>> platform-dependent due to newline differences between windows and unix
>>> (and the way these are encoded in UTF-16/stored in SVN)?
>>>
>>> I don't do really any work with files in UTF-16 so this is just a theory.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Mark Miller<markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hudson runs all the tests and emails java-dev if any of them fail.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>    [
>>> >>
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726479#action_12726479
>>> >> ]
>>> >>
>>> >> Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1707:
>>> >> -------------------------------------
>>> >>
>>> >> bq. Why doesn't Hudson encounter this problem?
>>> >>
>>> >> Forgive my ignorance, does hudson also run tests or just verify build?
>>> >> These files are only used in tests!
>>> >>
>>> >> I agree we should correct it, and perhaps to prevent other problems
>>> >> these
>>> >> files should be converted to UTF-8.
>>> >>
>>> >> For the record I am still confused about these java-code analyzers that
>>> >> implement snowball algorithms, why do they exist when the same
>>> >> functionality
>>> >> is in contrib/snowball?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > Don't use ensureOpen() excessively in IndexReader and IndexWriter
>>> >> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >
>>> >> >                 Key: LUCENE-1707
>>> >> >                 URL:
>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1707
>>> >> >             Project: Lucene - Java
>>> >> >          Issue Type: Improvement
>>> >> >          Components: Index
>>> >> >            Reporter: Shai Erera
>>> >> >             Fix For: 2.9
>>> >> >
>>> >> >         Attachments: LUCENE-1707.patch, LUCENE-1707.patch
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > A spin off from here:
>>> >> > http://www.nabble.com/Excessive-use-of-ensureOpen()-td24127806.html.
>>> >> > We should stop calling this method when it's not necessary for any
>>> >> > internal Lucene code. Currently, this code seems to hurt properly
>>> >> > written
>>> >> > apps, unnecessarily.
>>> >> > Will post a patch soon
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>> >> -
>>> >> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > --
>>> > - Mark
>>> >
>>> > http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Robert Muir
>>> rcm...@gmail.com
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Robert Muir
rcm...@gmail.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to