DateTools.java general improvements
-----------------------------------

                 Key: LUCENE-1736
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1736
             Project: Lucene - Java
          Issue Type: Improvement
    Affects Versions: 2.9
            Reporter: David Smiley
            Priority: Minor
         Attachments: cleanerDateTools.patch

Applying the attached patch shows the improvements to DateTools.java that I 
think should be done. All logic that does anything at all is moved to instance 
methods of the inner class Resolution. I argue this is more object-oriented.

1. In cases where Resolution is an argument to the method, I can simply invoke 
the appropriate call on the Resolution object. Formerly there was a big branch 
if/else.
2. Instead of "synchronized" being used seemingly everywhere, synchronized is 
used to sync on the object that is not threadsafe, be it a DateFormat or 
Calendar instance.
3. Since different DateFormat and Calendar instances are created 
per-Resolution, there is now less lock contention since threads using different 
resolutions will not use the same locks.
4. The old implementation of timeToString rounded the time before formatting 
it. That's unnecessary since the format only includes the resolution desired.
5. round() now uses a switch statement that benefits from fall-through (no 
break).

Another debatable improvement that could be made is putting the resolution 
instances into an array indexed by format length. This would mean I could 
remove the switch in lookupResolutionByLength() and avoid the length constants 
there. Maybe that would be a bit too over-engineered when the switch is fine.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to