>> LUCENE-1628 Persian Analyzer LUCENE-1583 SpanOrQuery skipTo() >> doesn't always move forwards >> >> Fairly straightforward, but I havn't looked too hard yet - feel free to >> take.
>I'm confused -- it looks like you have dug into both of these (1628 and 1583)? Sorry - that line should just be 1628 there - I didn't see 1583 snuck in on that line - I addressed it below: > LUCENE-1583 SpanOrQuery skipTo() doesn't always move forwards > > This one is basically ready to be committed to. I looked at 1628, but long enough ago now that I remember nothing - Im sure visiting the JIRA issue would refresh my memory. - Mark On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Mark Miller<markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For my issues: > > > > LUCENE-1695 Update the Highlighter to use the new TokenStream API > > > > I've done most of the work, but 1693 changes things and I've been > waiting... > > > > LUCENE-1685 Make the Highlighter use SpanScorer > > > > I started a little - but all kinds of conflicts between 1693 and 1695 so > > been trying to hold off till I can commit 1695... > > > > LUCENE-1628 Persian Analyzer LUCENE-1583 SpanOrQuery skipTo() > > doesn't always move forwards > > > > Fairly straightforward, but I havn't looked too hard yet - feel free to > > take. > > I'm confused -- it looks like you have dug into both of these (1628 and > 1583)? > > > LUCENE-1725 Benchmark package uses new TopFieldCollector but also > still > > uses AUTO without resolving it - result is, our sort algorithms won't run > > > > I can get this - just need a few spare minutes sometime soon. > > > > LUCENE-1688 Deprecating StopAnalyzer ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS - General > > replacement with an immutable Set > > > > I think this patch is ready to go, I just havn't committed yet. > > > > LUCENE-1583 SpanOrQuery skipTo() doesn't always move forwards > > > > This one is basically ready to be committed to. > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Michael McCandless > > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> > >> We are down to 20 issues left for 2.9! > >> > >> For those of you who have 2.9 issues assigned to you, but haven't > >> started yet or won't be able to get to them soon, can you unassign > >> yourself, and/or push the issue out? > >> > >> I'd like to start taking some of them. > >> > >> I realize a number of issues are held up on LUCENE-1693, so we really > >> need get that [big] one done soon. > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > > - Mark > > > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com
