On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 8:30 AM, DM Smith<dmsmith...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 1, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> I'm wondering how the new IndexWriter.getReader stuff relates to >> that approach? Is there even a need for the RAM dirs at this point? > > I'm curious as to how it obviates the need for a RAM dir?
I think Grant just meant that when implementing very low latency searching, one may not need to directly use RAMDirectory anymore. RAMDirectory itself will certainly be kept around in Lucene. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org