On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 8:30 AM, DM Smith<dmsmith...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I'm wondering how the new IndexWriter.getReader stuff relates to
>> that approach?  Is there even a need for the RAM dirs at this point?
>
> I'm curious as to how it obviates the need for a RAM dir?

I think Grant just meant that when implementing very low latency
searching, one may not need to directly use RAMDirectory anymore.
RAMDirectory itself will certainly be kept around in Lucene.

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to