Grant Ingersoll wrote:

On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:

 2.9 was _SUPPOSED_ to be a deprecation release,
Whats a deprecation release? We deprecate stuff in every release ... does it make sense to do a release just to deprecate anything we might not have yet? And if you add deprecations, wouldn't you add features to move to?

I'm not a fan of 3.0 just being 2.9 with deprecations removed either. Why not add new features as well? Sure, we should be *way* more careful about breaking back compat there, but who cares if a few features are introduced? Doing a release is a lot of project steam - why waste it ?

--
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to