Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Aug 10, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
2.9 was _SUPPOSED_ to be a deprecation release,
Whats a deprecation release? We deprecate stuff in every release ...
does it make sense to do a release just to deprecate anything we might
not have yet? And if you add deprecations, wouldn't you add features to
move to?
I'm not a fan of 3.0 just being 2.9 with deprecations removed either.
Why not add new features as well? Sure, we should be *way* more careful
about breaking back compat there, but who cares if a few features are
introduced? Doing a release is a lot of project steam - why waste it ?
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org