[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12742836#action_12742836
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1805:
--------------------------------------------

bq. Don't you want to move the test to o.a.l.util as well?

Woops, right, I'll do that before committing.

> CloseableThreadLocal should allow null Objects
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1805
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1805
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: contrib/analyzers
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Shai Erera
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1805.patch, LUCENE-1805.patch
>
>
> CloseableThreadLocal does not allow null Objects in its get() method, but 
> does nothing to prevent them in set(Object). The comment in get() before 
> assert v != null is irrelevant - the application might have passed null.
> Null is an important value for Analyzers. Since tokenStreams (a ThreadLocal 
> private member in Analyzer) is not accessible by extending classes, the only 
> way for an Analyzer to reset the tokenStreams is by calling 
> setPreviousTokenStream(null).
> I will post a patch w/ a test

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to