Simon Willnauer wrote: > > Having 3.0 > with 1.4 back-compat and then 3.1 which get rid of this would confuse > users. > > simon > > If that was really a concern (and we decided to jump to 3.0), we could just say this 3.0 release requires Java 1.5 - 3.0 and beyond can still be considered Java 1.5. Even though 3.0 itself still happens to run on Java 1.4. We are not going to convert *everything* to Java 1.5 when we move to it on the first release. We also don't have to convert anything to say we now require it.
Personally, I wouldn't be too worried about it either way. Following Changes correctly and with a solid understanding is 100x times more difficult and confusing. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
