On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Jason
Rutherglen<jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't like to chime in about these things because I don't
> really care too much, but it seemed like (for the last several
> months), 2.9 was going to be on Java 1.4, then 3.0 would include
> deprectations (maybe bug fixes). Then 3.1 was going to have some
> new functionality.

Right, that is and has been the "plan" for 2.9/3.0/3.1 for quite some time.

We are now discussing whether to change the plan, but so far it looks
likely we'll just stick with it...

Mike

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to