[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Preetam Rao updated LUCENE-1853:
--------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-1853.patch
Attached a patch with test cases. Position increment and offset always assumed
to be incremented by 1. May not work with increments other than
> PhraseQuery Scorer for scoring sub phrase matches
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1853
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1853
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Environment: Lucene/Java
> Reporter: Preetam Rao
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-1853.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 336h
> Remaining Estimate: 336h
>
> For a query like "homes in new york with swimming pool", if a document's
> field matches only "new york" it should get scored and it should get scored
> higher than two separate matches "new" and "york". Also, a 3 word sub phrase
> match must gets scored considerably higher than a 2 word sub phrase match.
> (boost factor should be configurable)
> If a user query is taken as is without parsing and is searched against
> multiple fields, where each sub-phrase can match against a different field,
> this kind of query is useful.
> Using shingles for this use case, means each field of each document needs to
> be indexed as shingles of all (1..N)-grams as well as the query. (Please
> correct me if I am wrong.)
> The scorer could also support
> - ignoring of idf and/or field norms, (so that factors outside the document
> don't influence scoring)
> - consider only the longest match (for example match on "new york" is scored
> and considered rather than "new" furniture and "york" city)
> - ignore duplicates ("new york" appearing twice or thrice does not make any
> difference)
> This kind of query (Phrase Query with SubPhraseScorer) could be combined with
> DisMax query. For example, something like solr's dismax request handler can
> be made to use this query where we run a user query as it is against all
> fields and configure each field with above configurations.
> I have also attached a patch with comments and test cases in case, my
> description is not clear enough. Would appreciate alternatives or feedback.
> The goal is to give more control via configuration when searching using user
> entered queries against multiple fields where sub phrases have special
> significance.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
