Chris Hostetter wrote: > : Thanks for the help finishing up the javadoc cleanup Hoss - we almost > : have a clean javadoc run - which is fantastic, because I didn't think it > : was going to be possible. I think its just this and 1863 and the run is > : clean. > > you obviously haven't tried "ant javadocs -Djavadoc.access=private" lately > ... i'm working on cleaning that up at the moment. > > > > -Hoss > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > tried it? I'm not even aware of it. Not mentioned in the release todo.
When I'm talking clean run, I mean no errors/warnings on packaging the release. Unfortunately, that doesn't guarantee that all the links work (broken links can get through without a wanring/error) - but it does make it so that people will be more likely to notice and fix issues - when there are always some errors/warnings, people tend to ignore them easier. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
