Chris Hostetter wrote: > : Prob want to run it on decent hardware as well (eg mabye I shouldn't do > : it with my 5200 rpm laptop drives). > > as long as both are run on the same hardware, and the page lists the > hardware, it's the relative numbers that matter the most. > > > > -Hoss > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > Agreed to a degree - people like and read off raw numbers though. I like to show Lucene in the best light possible (or least avg light - trust me - these drives are so poky - basically I was just trying to get someone else with normal hardware to do it).
And in the guessing my butt off space - perhaps 2.9 takes advantage of faster hardware better than 2.4 did. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
