NM - didn't read the code - I see you ||'d it. I'm revving up to do the
RC soon - if anyone has any objections or anything they want to hold off
for - speak up.

Mark Miller wrote:
> Should this go in the release todo?
>
> mikemcc...@apache.org wrote:
>   
>> Author: mikemccand
>> Date: Thu Aug 27 17:05:53 2009
>> New Revision: 808530
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=808530&view=rev
>> Log:
>> fix TestCheckIndex to accept either 2.9 or 2.9-dev as valid, from 
>> common-build.xml
>>
>> Modified:
>>     lucene/java/trunk/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestCheckIndex.java
>>
>> Modified: 
>> lucene/java/trunk/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestCheckIndex.java
>> URL: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestCheckIndex.java?rev=808530&r1=808529&r2=808530&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- lucene/java/trunk/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestCheckIndex.java 
>> (original)
>> +++ lucene/java/trunk/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestCheckIndex.java 
>> Thu Aug 27 17:05:53 2009
>> @@ -93,7 +93,9 @@
>>    public void testLuceneConstantVersion() throws IOException {
>>      // common-build.xml sets lucene.version
>>      final String version = System.getProperty("lucene.version");
>> -    assertEquals(version, Constants.LUCENE_MAIN_VERSION+"-dev");
>> +    assertNotNull(version);
>> +    assertTrue(version.equals(Constants.LUCENE_MAIN_VERSION+"-dev") ||
>> +               version.equals(Constants.LUCENE_MAIN_VERSION));
>>      assertTrue(Constants.LUCENE_VERSION.startsWith(version));
>>    }
>>  }
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to