[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749127#action_12749127
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872:
---------------------------------------
bq. As far as I can tell, I didn't lose any of the experimental warnings - Uwe
where did you see that?
My fault. I did not see that you moved the warning to the top in
NumericRangeQuery.
Looks good.
> Improve javadocs for Numeric*
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1872
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1872.patch, LUCENE-1872.patch
>
>
> I'm working on improving Numeric* javadocs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
