[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750621#action_12750621
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1887:
------------------------------------------
These classes have not relation with the queryparser code, the queryparser only
uses it. Maybe in future other parts of lucene may start using it. So I vote to
leave it outside queryParser package for now, and when other parts of lucene
start using it, we can think about moving it to core.
> o.a.l.messages should be moved/renamed
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1887
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> contrib/queryParser contains an org.apache.lucene.messages package containing
> some generallized code that (claims in it's javadocs) is not specific to the
> queryParser.
> If this is truely general purpose code, it should probably be moved out of
> hte queryParser contrib -- either into it's own contrib, or into the core
> (it's very small)
> Alternately: if the code isn't super reusable, the package name should
> probably be changed to be a subpackage of org.apache.lucene.queryParser ...
> it tends to be very confusing when all of the code in a contrib doesn't fall
> into a clear organizational namespace.
> I've marked this issue for 2.9 so we at least think about it prior to release
> ... it is a brand new public API, so this is out best chance to change it if
> we want ... but it is by no means a blocker for 2.9
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
