How about that patch, this was my idea yesterday, but I didn't want to start a new changes.txt format addition like this additional sentence in the entry?
----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yonik > Seeley > Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 5:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: svn commit: r812983 - /lucene/java/trunk/CHANGES.txt > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Uwe Schindler<[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, but we discussed yesterday, that the involved persons developing > the > > patches should get some credit... This is why I added this change to the > > log. > > If it's for the purpose of credit only, CHANGES should state that it's > not an actual bug. > Seems like there should be a threshold (i.e. non-trivial) for a new > CHANGES entry for the purposes of credit only... people have to read > this :-) If it's a significant contribution, simply add the person to > the main CHANGES entry. > > Think about it this way... what would have been done if the > bug/improvement was pointed out *before* the main feature had been > committed? If the contribution happens after commit, treat it the > same. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
changes.patch
Description: Binary data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
