[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12757178#action_12757178 ]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1919: ------------------------------------- Uwe, i tested your patch, this is good :) Just out of curiousity though, I am not sure i see the problem with next() then incrementToken() with my patch. (Your patch is better imho, this is not the issue). I tried your modified test and it passes with my patch also, is there something I am missing? > Analysis back compat break > -------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1919 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Yonik Seeley > Assignee: Uwe Schindler > Fix For: 2.9 > > Attachments: LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch, > LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch > > > Old and new style token streams don't mix well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org