[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761397#action_12761397
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-944:
------------------------------------
Hoss added some multireader test stuff that counts on where the deletes are if
I remember right.
so
{code}
- if (BooleanQuery.getAllowDocsOutOfOrder()) return; // in this case order
of skipTo() might differ from that of next().
+ if (q.weight(s).scoresDocsOutOfOrder()) return; // in this case order of
skipTo() might differ from that of next().
{code}
must not be exactly equiv and where it wasn't scoring out of order for this
test, now it is, or vice versa (I havn't looked closely).
> Remove deprecated methods in BooleanQuery
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-944
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Paul Elschot
> Assignee: Michael Busch
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0
>
> Attachments: BooleanQuery20070626.patch, lucene-944.patch
>
>
> Remove deprecated methods setUseScorer14 and getUseScorer14 in BooleanQuery,
> and adapt javadocs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
