That certainly makes sense. DM Smith wrote: > Please apply all bug fixes tto 2.9.0 as som of us have it as our last > Java1.4.2 release. > > > > On Oct 3, 2009, at 6:55 PM, "Uwe Schindler" <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > >> Should we now commit all fixes also to 2.9, which should go into >> 2.9.1, i >> fit will be released as a bugfix release together with 3.0 (e.g. the >> highlighter problem)? >> >> If yes, I would merge some of my commits into 2.9 (not the ones from >> today, >> hihi). >> >> Uwe >> >> ----- >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: markrmil...@apache.org [mailto:markrmil...@apache.org] >>> Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 12:52 AM >>> To: java-comm...@lucene.apache.org >>> Subject: svn commit: r821440 - >>> /lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searche >>> >>> r.java >>> >>> Author: markrmiller >>> Date: Sat Oct 3 22:52:12 2009 >>> New Revision: 821440 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=821440&view=rev >>> Log: >>> don't point to deprecated method >>> >>> Modified: >>> >>> lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher >>> >>> .java >>> >>> Modified: >>> lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher >>> >>> .java >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src/java/org/ >>> >>> apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java?rev=821440&r1=821439&r2=821440&view=dif >>> >>> f >>> ========================================================================== >>> >>> ==== >>> --- >>> lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher >>> >>> .java (original) >>> +++ >>> lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher >>> >>> .java Sat Oct 3 22:52:12 2009 >>> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ >>> * >>> * <p>Applications should only use this if they need <i>all</i> of the >>> * matching documents. The high-level search API ({...@link >>> - * Searcher#search(Query)}) is usually more efficient, as it skips >>> + * Searcher#search(Query, int)}) is usually more efficient, as it >>> skips >>> * non-high-scoring hits. >>> * <p>Note: The <code>score</code> passed to this method is a raw >>> score. >>> * In other words, the score will not necessarily be a float whose >>> value >>> is >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >
-- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
