Aaron, could you move this to solr-user? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Aaron McKee <ucbmc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In the code I'm working with, I generate a cache of calculated values as a > by-product within a Filter.getDocidSet implementation (and within a > Query-ized version of the filter and its Scorer method) . These values are > keyed off the IndexReader's docID values, since that's all that's accessible > at that level. Ultimately, however, I need to be able to access these values > much higher up in the stack (Solr's QueryComponent.process method), so that > I can inject the dynamic values into the response as a fake field. The IDs > available here, however, are for the entire index and not just relative to > the current IndexReader. I'm still fairly new to Lucene and I've been > scratching my head a bit trying to find a reliable way to map these values > into the same space, without having to hack up too many base classes. I > noticed that there was a related discussion at: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1821?focusedCommentId=12745041#action_12745041 > > ... but also a bit of disagreement on the suggested strategies. Ideally, I'm > also hoping there's a strategy that won't require me to hack up too much of > the core product; subclassing IndexSearcher in the way suggested would > basically require me to change all of the various SearchComponents I use in > Solr, and that sounds like it'd end up a real maintenance nightmare. I was > looking at the Collector class as possible solution, since it has knowledge > of the docbase, but it looks like I'd then need to change every derived > collector that the code ultimately uses and, including the various anonymous > Collectors in Solr, that also looks like it'd be a fairly ghoulish solution. > I suppose I'm being wishful, or lazy, but is there a reasonable and reliable > way to do this, without having to fork the core code? If not, any suggestion > on the best strategy to accomplish this, without adding too much overhead > every time I wanted to up-rev the core Lucene and/or Solr code to the latest > version? > > Thanks a ton, > Aaron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
