[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763352#action_12763352
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1960 at 10/7/09 9:40 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Just one question: What happens with indexes that already had compressed
fields. Do they behave as before?
*edit*
>From the patch I see that you also removed the bitmask for testing compression
>in index format. So an index with compressed fields from 2.9 should behave
>undefined. In my opinion, support for reading compressed fields should stay
>available, but not for writing. And: as soon as segments are merged, they
>should get silently uncompressed (what should be no problem if the special
>FieldForMerge is no longer used).
Also the constant bitmask for compression should stay "reserved" for futrure
use.
was (Author: thetaphi):
Just one question: What happens with indexes that already had compressed
fields. Do they behave as before?
> Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1960
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Michael Busch
> Assignee: Michael Busch
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0
>
> Attachments: lucene-1960.patch
>
>
> Also remove FieldForMerge and related code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
