[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764515#action_12764515
]
Basem Narmok commented on LUCENE-1966:
--------------------------------------
Seems good.
BTW with FAST ESP we never used stopwords, as hits from stopwords get low
relevancy (keywords with high number of hits = low value, low importance, so
less relevant), so such hits will never get into the top results. Also, using
stopwords will affect phrase search, most of the search engines avoid removing
them. But, at the end it depends on the client's application, and what she
really wants, as enterprise search could have very specific and different needs
than Internet search.
Anyways, still I am testing the Arabic Analyzer, and I will provide you with
more comments soon. but for the stopwords they are good for now :)
> Arabic Analyzer: Stopwords list needs enhancement
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1966
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/analyzers
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Basem Narmok
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.0
>
> Attachments: arabic-stopwords-comments.txt, LUCENE-1966.patch,
> LUCENE-1966.patch
>
>
> The provided Arabic stopwords list needs some enhancements (e.g. it contains
> a lot of words that not stopwords, and some cleanup) . patch will be provided
> with this issue.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
