[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765544#action_12765544
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974:
--------------------------------------------
As a test, to tease out more corner cases, I temporarily dropped
BooleanScorer's chunk size from 2048 to 16, and ran all tests. Everything
passed.
> BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1974
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Query/Scoring
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: tangfulin
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 2.9.1, 3.0
>
> Attachments: BooleanQueryTest.java, LUCENE-1974.test.patch,
> LUCENE-1974.test.patch
>
>
> query: (name:tang*)
> doc=5137 score=1.0 doc:Document<stored,indexed<name:tangfulin>>
> doc=11377 score=1.0 doc:Document<stored,indexed<name:tangfulin>>
> query: name:tang* name:notexistnames
> doc=5137 score=0.048133932 doc:Document<stored,indexed<name:tangfulin>>
> It is two queries on the same index, one is just a prefix query in a
> boolean query, and the other is a prefix query plus a term query in a
> boolean query, all with Occur.SHOULD .
> what I wonder is why the later query can not find the doc=11377 doc ?
> the problem can be repreduced by the code in the attachment .
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
