I'll just remove TestStressSort... Mike
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Indeed! It's doing nothing now. Just creating Sort objects but not > in fact doing any searching with them. Hmm. > > Unfortunately, the test very much relied on the deprecated > "setUseLegacySearch" API, to compare old vs new sorting. I suppose > its time has past, given that it has had a good amount of time, now, > to assert that old and new were producing identical results. > > Should we just remove it? > > Mike > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Mark Miller wrote: >>> TestStressSort has been butchered. >>> >>> >> I suppose we could just pull it since it wouldn't check for much any >> more - looks awful funny as is. >> >> -- >> - Mark >> >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
