Uwe, or anyone, any objections to cutting a 2.9.1 RC tomorrow? It looks like LUCENE-1960 is going to go with the decompress-on-merge option?
Mike On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > I try to get the rest of search deprecations away in 3.0, but then we should > be sure, that there are no more such problems like with the posIncrement in > QueryParser that need additional changes in 2.9.1 API. > > Maybe somebody can help me with the rest of LUCENE-1973, the rest is > explain() in Scorer (hard to do because lots of references to this method > even in core), then we have IndexSearcher.fieldSortDoTrackScores / > IS.fieldSortDoMaxScore (which is simple I think - I even did not know that > these settings existed) and last but not least the deprecated > MultiValueSource. The hardest one is the first. > > After that all deprecations are removed, only some small things need to be > solved like the overridesTokenStreamMethod in Analyzer (I would keep it in > 3.0, as we cannot guarantee that every analyzer reuses tokenstreams unless > we make all core/contrib analyzers final). And there are some deprecated > classes to be removed in 4.0 when the support for old indexes is gone. > > Open is still the problem with compressed fields (see LUCENE-1960), if we > use option 3 (isCompressed() deprec method, we have to add it to 2.9, too -> > I would not prefer this). > > After that 3.0 is also almost finished, I have generics (almost) everywhere > in core, Parameter -> enum replacement, StringBuilder, varargs (not yet > finished, I have to visit method signatures and add varargs where possible). > New Number() removed by valueOf(),... Some new defaults also need to be > implemented. > > Also some final revisiting of generics should be done, there are some > strange parts with collections where it is not clearly defined what's in it. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] >> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:27 PM >> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: 2.9.1 >> >> OK we are now down to 0 issues!! It's been exciting :) >> >> Assuming nothing crops up over the weekend, I plan to start the >> release process on Monday. >> >> Mike >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
