Yeah 2.9.1 is already well on its way to releasing; we could back-port this for a possible 2.9.2?
I'll include the drop-in-ability in the release note for 2.9.1; don't yet have a draft but I'll make one real soon now! Mike On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Yes, this was already fixed in trunk (by adding generics, where the return > value is generified to Fieldable). For 2.9.1 it is too late, I think? Mike? > > Mike: Do you have already a release note formulated? The main information > should be the bug fixes, but also that only 2.9.1 will be binary compatible > to 3.0 (when all deprecation warnings in customer's code removed), because > we added new methods, deprecated the old analyzer ctors and also > un-deprecated some methods. So users migrating to 3.0 should first use 2.9.1 > not 2.9.0 to clean up their code from deprecations. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bernd Fondermann [mailto:bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:05 PM >> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: LUCENE-1954 and 2.9.1 >> >> Hi, >> >> Probably I'm too late to the party pointing out that LUCENE-1954 is >> especially suited to be applied to the 2.9.x line. >> The patch is obsolete for 3.x/TRUNK. >> >> Bernd >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
