if you havent already started, i found a minor problem in the smartcn public
javadocs while updating it to generics. here is a patch for 29 branch
Index:
contrib/analyzers/smartcn/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/hhmm/HHMMSegmenter.java
===================================================================
---
contrib/analyzers/smartcn/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/hhmm/HHMMSegmenter.java
(revision 831005)
+++
contrib/analyzers/smartcn/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/hhmm/HHMMSegmenter.java
(working copy)
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.CharType;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.Utility;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.WordType;
-import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.hhmm.PathNode;//javadoc @link
+import org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.hhmm.SegToken;//javadoc @link
/**
* Finds the optimal segmentation of a sentence into Chinese words
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
}
/**
- * Return a list of {...@link PathNode} representing the best segmentation
of a sentence
+ * Return a list of {...@link SegToken} representing the best segmentation
of a sentence
* @param sentence input sentence
* @return best segmentation as a {...@link List}
*/
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael McCandless <
[email protected]> wrote:
> So the 3 issues are now back-ported to 2.9.x branch. Any other issues
> we want to back port? If nobody answers in a few hours I'll spin a
> new RC...
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Michael McCandless
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > OK I'll spin a new RC.
> >
> > I'll also backport the thread-safety fix to contrib/benchmark
> (LUCENE-1994).
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Robert found another bug in 2.9. I resolved one yesterday and reopened
> >> LUCENE-2002.
> >>
> >> So I changed my mind: -1 :(
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >> http://www.thetaphi.de
> >> eMail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:05 PM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Cc: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1, take 2
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless <
> >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
> >>> > from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging->
> >>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging-
> >>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/>
> >>> >
> >>> > Changes are here:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging->
> >>> area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/stagin
> >>> g-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/>
> >>> >
> >>> > Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene
> >>> > Java 2.9.1.
> >>> >
> >>> > Mike
> >>> >
> >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Robert Muir
> >>> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
