[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12771566#action_12771566
 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2017:
---------------------------------------

If we would do it that way, we wouldn't need the CloseableThreadLocal at all. 
Because even with 1.4 you can do a remove() by simply setting the value to null 
(internally remove() does exactly that, see src.java in yor jdk). So 
CloseableThreadLocal is needed.

About the multiple-Threads closing problem: This does not affect Lucene, as it 
keeps track, when it can be closed. If you close it to early it is the same as 
closing an IndexInput at the wrong time. So do not worry!

> CloseableThreadLocal is now obsolete
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2017
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2017
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>            Reporter: Cédrik LIME
>         Attachments: CloseableThreadLocal.patch
>
>
> Since Lucene 3 depends on Java 5, we can use ThreadLocal#remove() to take 
> care or resource management.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to