I don't see any reason to freeze new contributions from any release.
On 10/30/2009 03:19 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
thanks Michael.
does anyone else have any opinion on this issue?
fyi we already have several new features committed to 3.0 contrib
already (see contrib/CHANGES),
but I don't too much care either way, if I should not be adding this
feature to 3.0, I'd like to set the version in jira to 3.1
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Michael McCandless
<luc...@mikemccandless.com <mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com>> wrote:
I think we should allow new features into contrib for 3.0.
I don't even like holding new features from core for 3.0.
In general I don't think it's healthy when trunk is locked down....
Trunk should be like a locomotive that's plowing ahead at all times.
Mike
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com
<mailto:rcm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the consensus on new features for contrib for Lucene
3.0? I know
> that for core, its mostly a java 5 upgrade and deprecation removal.
>
> I want to make sure LUCENE-1606 is set to the right version, but
I figured
> its really not just about that specific issue, I would like to
know the
> plans in general.
>
> Thanks,
> Robert
>
> --
> Robert Muir
> rcm...@gmail.com <mailto:rcm...@gmail.com>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
--
Robert Muir
rcm...@gmail.com <mailto:rcm...@gmail.com>
