[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776781#action_12776781
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1260:
--------------------------------------------
Performance looks good -- I tested with query "1" on a 5M doc wikipedia index
and any difference appears to be in the noise.
But, the current patch breaks back-compat (eg {{ant test-tag
-Dtestcase=TestNorms}} fails) -- I think we have to put back the static methods
(mark them deprecated), and then find new names for the instance methods?
> Norm codec strategy in Similarity
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 2.3.1
> Reporter: Karl Wettin
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: Lucene-1260-1.patch, Lucene-1260.patch, LUCENE-1260.txt,
> LUCENE-1260.txt, LUCENE-1260.txt
>
>
> The static span and resolution of the 8 bit norms codec might not fit with
> all applications.
> My use case requires that 100f-250f is discretized in 60 bags instead of the
> default.. 10?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
