[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1948:
----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: 3.0)
                   3.1

I move this to 3.1. The writer was already transformed to the new TokenStream 
API (not really effective, but works). We can deprecate it it 3.1 if needed.

> Deprecating InstantiatedIndexWriter
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1948
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1948
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: contrib/*
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Karl Wettin
>            Assignee: Karl Wettin
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1948.patch
>
>
> http://markmail.org/message/j6ip266fpzuaibf7
> I suppose that should have been suggested before 2.9 rather than  
> after...
> There are at least three reasons to why I want to do this:
> The code is based on the behaviour or the Directory IndexWriter as of  
> 2.3 and I have not been touching it since then. If there will be  
> changes in the future one will have to keep IIW in sync, something  
> that's easy to forget.
> There is no locking which will cause concurrent modification  
> exceptions when accessing the index via searcher/reader while  
> committing.
> It use the old token stream API so it has to be upgraded in case it  
> should stay.
> The java- and package level docs have since it was committed been  
> suggesting that one should consider using II as if it was immutable  
> due to the locklessness. My suggestion is that we make it immutable  
> for real.
> Since II is ment for small corpora there is very little time lost by  
> using the constructor that builts the index from an IndexReader. I.e.  
> rather than using InstantiatedIndexWriter one would have to use a  
> Directory and an IndexWriter and then pass an IndexReader to a new  
> InstantiatedIndex.
> Any objections?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to