Robert Muir wrote: > > >> and I think it sucks they might have to reindex twice with the >> current status of things (we did not complete unicode 4 support >> in lucene 3.0) >> which is why i mentioned this problem on the unicode 4 issues im >> trying to work. > > Whether 3.0 goes out as it is now or with these fixes is up to the > voters. > > > The problem is that we want 3.0 to be a 'clean' release with no > deprecations. > It is impossible to do so, and also have unicode 4 support in 3.0 (we > will need to deprecate a few things) > We couldnt do this in 2.9, because you need jdk 1.5 or icu to do even > basic stuff like (U)Character.isLetter(int) :) > > > Always depends though. This double index thing you mention is nasty (3.0 and 3.1 for the unfortunate). I'd swallow a few careful deprecations in 3.0 to avoid that with my vote.
-- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
