Hi Robert, Ack, actually two days ago I updated my Lucene trunk checkout and removed that code, thinking its utility had evaporated!
But maybe IntelliJ will save my bacon in its local history cache. (Praise IntelliJ!) I'll check tonight when I get home. Steve On 11/19/2009 at 10:16 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > Steven, do you still have a test setup to measure collation key > generation performance with Lucene? > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > > > On 11/18/2009 at 7:16 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > Looking at the > collation support, we could maybe improve > IndexableBinaryStringTools > by using char[]/byte[] with offset and > length. The existing > ByteBuffer/CharBuffer methods could stay, they are > consistent with > Charset api and are not wrong imo, but instead defer to > the new > char[]/byte[] ones... the current buffer-based ones require the > > buffer to have a backing array anyway or will throw an exception. > > > +1 > > I used *Buffers because I thought it simplified method > prototypes, no other reason. > > Steve > > > > > > > -- > Robert Muir > rcm...@gmail.com
