[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12780703#action_12780703
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2086:
------------------------------------------
bq. I don't think it should be backported (it's an optimization). Generally we
[should] only back port bug fixes.
It doesn't break backwards compatibility and it's well under the hood so it
seems like something that go into a sub decimal release?
> When resolving deletes, IW should resolve in term sort order
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2086
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2086.patch
>
>
> See java-dev thread "IndexWriter.updateDocument performance improvement".
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
