On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > They're ready to go, but at Uwe's suggestion, I've been waiting for 3.0 to > get settled before prompting someone to apply this patch. I was going to > generate a new patch for this and for 2037 (junit4 tests) just to make sure > they were easy to apply. But if you're willing, the patches are already > attached to the JIRA issues. Do note that the decision in > MinBooleanShouldMatch to stop checking the query after 100 rather than > checking all 1,000 is included in the patch....
Uwe do you still think we should wait? 3.0.0 looks like it's "out"? > Do you want to apply the patches or should I regenerate? It's no big deal to > regenerate them and I'll have a better feel for reconciling any conflicts. I > don't know whether there even *are* any conflicts, but just in case.... Let's hold up until we hear from Uwe... > For my info, though, if I have a more recent patch that *replaces* an > earlier patch, especially one that hasn't yet been applied, is it preferred > to delete the earlier patch when providing a new one? Actually in general I prefer people not delete the old patches... This way if there's a question/confusion we can always go back & compare old to new. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
