[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12786697#action_12786697
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1613:
-------------------------------------
bq. As an outside observer I would argue against keeping the bug open forever
for correctness sake.
I agree - its not really a bug. Its by design.
bq. I suppose we could make a "fixTermCounts()" method, which takes a looong
time as it iterates through the postings for each term to compute the actual
count,
Just call expungeDeletes?
+1 on closing.
> TermEnum.docFreq() is not updated with there are deletes
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1613
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1613
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 2.4
> Reporter: John Wang
> Attachments: TestDeleteAndDocFreq.java
>
>
> TermEnum.docFreq is used in many places, especially scoring. However, if
> there are deletes in the index and it is not yet merged, this value is not
> updated.
> Attached is a test case.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
