nice - I closed the issue. thanks uwe On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > The missing maven artifacts for the fast-vector-highlighter contrib of > Lucene Java in version 2.9.1 and 3.0.0 are now available at: > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/ > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/ > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > uschind...@apache.org > Apache Lucene Java Committer > Bremen, Germany > http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/ > >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 10:41 PM >> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; gene...@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Push fast-vector-highlighter mvn artifacts for 3.0.0 >> and 2.9.1 >> >> I got 3 binding votes from Grant, Mike, and Ted (and one from Simon, who >> was >> a big help on Sunday evening when I created the artifacts), so I push the >> maven artifacts onto the rsync repo in few minutes. >> >> Thanks! >> >> ----- >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] >> > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 7:03 PM >> > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> > Subject: [VOTE] Push fast-vector-highlighter mvn artifacts for 3.0.0 and >> > 2.9.1 >> > >> > Sorry, >> > >> > I initially didn't want to start a vote, as Grant only proposed to >> "maybe >> > start one". But nobody responded (esp. to the questions in this mail) I >> > ask >> > again, an I will start the vote for now. >> > >> > >> ========================================================================== >> > == >> > Please vote, that the missing artifacts for of fast-verctor-highlighter >> of >> > Lucene Java 2.9.1 and 3.0.0 should be pushed to repoX.maven.org. >> > >> > You can find the artifacts here: >> > http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/ >> > >> > This dir contains only the maven folder to be copied to maven-rsync dir >> on >> > p.a.o. The top-level version in the maven metadata is 3.0.0, which >> > conforms >> > to the current state on maven (so during merging both folders during >> > build, >> > I set preference to metadata.xml of 3.0.0). >> > >> > All files are signed by my PGP key (even the 2.9.1 ones; that release >> was >> > originally built by Mike McCandless). >> > >> ========================================================================== >> > == >> > >> > What I additionally found out until now (because Simon nagged me): >> > >> > If you compare the JAR files inside the binary ZIP file from the apache >> > archive and the JAR files directly published on maven (for the other >> > contribs), the MD5s/SHA1s are different even as they are created from >> the >> > same source code (because the timestamps inside the JAR are different, >> for >> > 2.9.1 another JDK compiler/platform was used). This interestingly does >> not >> > apply to lucene-core.jar in 3.0. Because of that I see no problem with >> > this >> > maven release, even that they are not the orginal JAR files from the >> > binary >> > distrib. >> > >> > What is not nice, is that the svn revision number in the manifest is >> > different, but else is exactly the same, see my comments below in >> earlier >> > mails about changing the ant script for showing the SVN rev of the last >> > changed file. >> > >> > So if nobody objects to release these rebuild jar files, all signed by >> my >> > key, I would like to simply put them on the maven-rsync folder. >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > ----- >> > Uwe Schindler >> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> > http://www.thetaphi.de >> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org] >> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 6:48 PM >> > > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> > > Subject: Re: (NAG) Push fast-vector-highlighter mvn artifacts for 3.0 >> > and >> > > 2.9 >> > > >> > > >> > > : What to do now, any votes on adding the missing maven artifacts for >> > > : fast-vector-highlighter to 2.9.1 and 3.0.0 on the apache maven >> > > reposititory? >> > > >> > > It's not even clear to me that anything special needs to be done >> before >> > > publishing those jars to maven. 2.9.1 and 3.0.0 were already voted on >> > and >> > > released -- including all of the source code in them. >> > > >> > > The safest bet least likely to anger the process gods is just to call >> a >> > > vote (new thread with VOTE in the subject) and cast a vote ... >> > considering >> > > the sources has already been reviewed it should go pretty quick. >> > > >> > > : >> > > : > I rebuilt the maven-dir for 2.9.1 and 3.0.0, merged them (3.0.0 is >> > > top- >> > > : > level >> > > : > version) and extracted only fast-vector-highlighter: >> > > : > >> > > : > http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/ >> > > : > >> > > : > I will copy this dir to the maven folder on people.a.o, when I got >> > > votes >> > > : > (how many)? At least someone should check the signatures. >> > > : > >> > > : > By the way, we have a small error in our ant build.xml that >> inserts >> > > : > svnversion into the manifest file. This version is not the version >> > of >> > > the >> > > : > last changed item (would be svnversion -c) but the current svn >> > > version, >> > > : > even >> > > : > that I checked out the corresponding tags. It's no problem at all, >> > but >> > > not >> > > : > very nice. >> > > : > >> > > : > Maybe we should change build.xml to call "svnversion -c" in >> future, >> > to >> > > get >> > > : > the real number. >> > > : > >> > > : > Uwe >> > > : > >> > > : > ----- >> > > : > Uwe Schindler >> > > : > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> > > : > http://www.thetaphi.de >> > > : > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> > > : > >> > > : > >> > > : > > -----Original Message----- >> > > : > > From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] >> > > : > > Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 10:26 PM >> > > : > > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> > > : > > Subject: Re: Push fast-vector-highlighter mvn artifacts for 3.0 >> > and >> > > 2.9 >> > > : > > >> > > : > > I suppose we could put up the artifacts on a dev site and then >> we >> > > could >> > > : > > vote to release both of them pretty quickly. I think that >> should >> > be >> > > : > easy >> > > : > > to do, since it pretty much only involves verifying the jar and >> > the >> > > : > > signatures. >> > > : > > >> > > : > > On Dec 5, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: >> > > : > > >> > > : > > > hi folks, >> > > : > > > The maven artifacts for fast-vector-highlighter have never >> been >> > > pushed >> > > : > > > since it was released because there were no pom.xml.template >> > > inside >> > > : > > > the module. I added a pom file a day ago in the context of >> > > : > > > LUCENE-2107. I already talked to uwe and grant how to deal >> with >> > > this >> > > : > > > issues and if we should push the artifact for Lucene 2.9 / >> 3.0. >> > > Since >> > > : > > > this is only a metadata file we could consider rebuilding the >> > > : > > > artefacts and publish them for those releases. I can not >> > remember >> > > that >> > > : > > > anything like that happened before, so we should discuss how >> to >> > > deal >> > > : > > > with this situation and if we should wait until 3.1. >> > > : > > > >> > > : > > > simon >> > > : > > > >> > > : > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> > -- >> > > --- >> > > : > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > : > > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev- >> h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > : > > > >> > > : > > >> > > : > > >> > > : > > >> > > : > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> > -- >> > > - >> > > : > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > : > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > : > >> > > : > >> > > : > >> > > : > ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> -- >> > - >> > > : > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > : > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > : >> > > : >> > > : >> > > : -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> > > : To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > : For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > : >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -Hoss >> > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
