[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790391#action_12790391
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1785:
------------------------------------------
bq. couldn't we pull a Term(s)Enum from the newly merged segment for that field
Yes, I think this makes the most sense, and won't adversely affect performance
because term dictionary file access is sequential.
> Simple FieldCache merging
> -------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1785
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1785.patch, LUCENE-1785.patch, LUCENE-1785.patch,
> LUCENE-1785.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> We'll merge the field caches in RAM as the SegmentReader's are
> merged in IndexWriter (the first cut will work in conjunction
> with IW.getReader). There will be an optional callback to
> determine which fields to merge.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
