> I guess since apache con we all agree on not using any of those > ambiguous terms for class naming anymore! Yet, before we think about a > name we should rather check if we can make this new functionality > optional in the already existing code. Each time I see German2Stemmer > it reminds me of this code duplication inside snowball / analyzers > which needs cleanup. LUCENE-1515 has been around for some time so we > should not rush with a commit until we have found a good solution > hopefully without having a Swedish2Stemmer.java.
I thought we wanted to add the new stemmer and use it with matchVersion >= LUCENE_31? That would be the best for all users, existing indexes would work and new users can use the new stemmer. Uwe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
