[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12803743#action_12803743
 ] 

Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1990:
--------------------------------------

The generated code in the patches has quite a few switch statements to decode a 
single value.
These switch statements could be avoided by using something like this (adapted 
from the 1410b patch):
{code}
/** Decode a value from the compressed array of b bit values by retrieving the 
corresponding bits.
 * Since numFrameBits is always smaller than the number of bits in an int,
 * at most two ints in the buffer will be used.
 */
public int decodeCompressedValueBase(int compressedPos, int numBits) {
  int compressedBitPos = numBits * compressedPos;
  int intIndex = (compressedBitPos >> 5);
  int firstBitPosition = compressedBitPos & 31;
  int value = intBuffer.get(intIndex) >>> firstBitPosition;
  if ((firstBitPosition + numBits) > 32) { // value does not fit in first int
    intIndex++;
    value |= (intBuffer.get(intIndex) << (32 - firstBitPosition));
  }
  final int maxValue = (int) ((1L << numBits) - 1);
  return value & maxValue;
}
{code}
As maxValue is essentially a mask, it could also be looked up in an array.

Could that be faster than these generated switch statements?


> Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1990
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1990-te20100122.patch, LUCENE-1990.patch, 
> LUCENE-1990_PerformanceMeasurements20100104.zip
>
>
> There are various places in Lucene that could take advantage of an
> efficient packed unsigned int/long impl.  EG the terms dict index in
> the standard codec in LUCENE-1458 could subsantially reduce it's RAM
> usage.  FieldCache.StringIndex could as well.  And I think "load into
> RAM" codecs like the one in TestExternalCodecs could use this too.
> I'm picturing something very basic like:
> {code}
> interface PackedUnsignedLongs  {
>   long get(long index);
>   void set(long index, long value);
> }
> {code}
> Plus maybe an iterator for getting and maybe also for setting.  If it
> helps, most of the usages of this inside Lucene will be "write once"
> so eg the set could make that an assumption/requirement.
> And a factory somewhere:
> {code}
>   PackedUnsignedLongs create(int count, long maxValue);
> {code}
> I think we should simply autogen the code (we can start from the
> autogen code in LUCENE-1410), or, if there is an good existing impl
> that has a compatible license that'd be great.
> I don't have time near-term to do this... so if anyone has the itch,
> please jump!

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to