[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830804#action_12830804
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2080:
--------------------------------------------
I like the new scary javadoc Robert! I think removing (deprecating today)
LUCENE_CURRENT may make sense -- it's very dangerous.
> Improve the documentation of Version
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2080
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Javadocs
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.9.2, 3.0, 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch
>
>
> In my opinion, we should elaborate more on the effects of changing the
> Version parameter.
> Particularly, changing this value, even if you recompile your code, likely
> involves reindexing your data.
> I do not think this is adequately clear from the current javadocs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
