[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2080:
--------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-2080.patch
updated patch with simon's suggestion, some reformatting and edits to be
slightly scarier.
if no one objects, will commit tomorrow (and backport, adjusting the 'latest
and greatest' wordage to the appropriate versions)
> Improve the documentation of Version
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2080
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Javadocs
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.9.2, 3.0, 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch, LUCENE-2080.patch,
> LUCENE-2080.patch
>
>
> In my opinion, we should elaborate more on the effects of changing the
> Version parameter.
> Particularly, changing this value, even if you recompile your code, likely
> involves reindexing your data.
> I do not think this is adequately clear from the current javadocs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
