[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Muir closed LUCENE-1513.
-------------------------------

    Resolution: Not A Problem

For Lucene, LUCENE-2089 will always be faster than even FastSS, as our 
FuzzyQuery is really a top-N query, and we can exploit properties of the 
priority queue to make it even faster.

LUCENE-2089 also works without any auxiliary index or data structures, just 
solely on lucene's terms dict, so it works great for updates/NRT/whatever, no 
back compat problems.

I'm cancelling this issue as the alternative is superior in every aspect.

> fastss fuzzyquery
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1513
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1513
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: contrib/*
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: fastSSfuzzy.zip
>
>
> code for doing fuzzyqueries with fastssWC algorithm.
> FuzzyIndexer: given a lucene field, it enumerates all terms and creates an 
> auxiliary offline index for fuzzy queries.
> FastFuzzyQuery: similar to fuzzy query except it queries the auxiliary index 
> to retrieve a candidate list. this list is then verified with levenstein 
> algorithm.
> sorry but the code is a bit messy... what I'm actually using is very 
> different from this so its pretty much untested. but at least you can see 
> whats going on or fix it up.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to