[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Robert Muir closed LUCENE-1513. ------------------------------- Resolution: Not A Problem For Lucene, LUCENE-2089 will always be faster than even FastSS, as our FuzzyQuery is really a top-N query, and we can exploit properties of the priority queue to make it even faster. LUCENE-2089 also works without any auxiliary index or data structures, just solely on lucene's terms dict, so it works great for updates/NRT/whatever, no back compat problems. I'm cancelling this issue as the alternative is superior in every aspect. > fastss fuzzyquery > ----------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1513 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1513 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: contrib/* > Reporter: Robert Muir > Priority: Minor > Attachments: fastSSfuzzy.zip > > > code for doing fuzzyqueries with fastssWC algorithm. > FuzzyIndexer: given a lucene field, it enumerates all terms and creates an > auxiliary offline index for fuzzy queries. > FastFuzzyQuery: similar to fuzzy query except it queries the auxiliary index > to retrieve a candidate list. this list is then verified with levenstein > algorithm. > sorry but the code is a bit messy... what I'm actually using is very > different from this so its pretty much untested. but at least you can see > whats going on or fix it up. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org