[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837880#action_12837880
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2282:
------------------------------------
bq. But I don't think we should back port to 3.0.2
Ok, I can live w/ 3.1, as long as it's not released at the end of 2010. I can
for now put that part of my code in o.a.l.index, until 3.1 is out.
As I wrote in the TestFileSwitchDirectory comment, this IMO has to go in,
because otherwise it would make the code of users of FSD fragile (potentially).
Thanks for looking at this !
> Expose IndexFileNames as public, and make use of its methods in the code
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2282
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2282
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2282.patch, LUCENE-2282.patch, LUCENE-2282.patch
>
>
> IndexFileNames is useful for applications that extend Lucene, an in
> particular those who extend Directory or IndexWriter. It provides useful
> constants and methods to query whether a certain file is a core Lucene file
> or not. In addition, IndexFileNames should be used by Lucene's code to
> generate segment file names, or query whether a certain file matches a
> certain extension.
> I'll post the patch shortly.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
