[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846620#action_12846620
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2323:
-------------------------------------

bq. I do want to propose to omit the component name from the package (where it 
makes sense).

Shai, I agree its a little redundant, yet under this issue I wanted to avoid 
changing package names 
as much as possible: changing the package name breaks people's code and thats 
why I wanted
to just do the first part, with no pkg naming changes.

I thought these initial svn moves are obvious wins, and any further stuff can 
be done later under another
issue... 

Typically I would prefer to do a full reorganization at once, but in my opinion 
that is for a later, probably
longer and more frustrating discussion, and it needs to involve Solr, too.


> reorganize contrib modules
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2323
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2323
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib/*
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>
> it would be nice to reorganize contrib modules, so that they are bundled 
> together by functionality.
> For example:
> * the wikipedia contrib is a tokenizer, i think really belongs in 
> contrib/analyzers
> * there are two highlighters, i think could be one highlighters package.
> * there are many queryparsers and queries in different places in contrib

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to