On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Toke Eskildsen <t...@statsbiblioteket.dk> wrote:
> Ah... I should have seen that. I does not change the overall picture though: > Althought the ICU collation keys are impressively small, they still take up > nearly as much space as the original Strings when they themselves are > represented as Strings. Thus the collation keys does not help memory usage > (much). > yeah they will only hurt you in trunk, because they are not really stored as byte[]. But if collation keys can actually be kept as just byte[] in flex, perhaps it could be handy by allowing you to offline the Collator stuff to index-time. -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
