I think that's a good idea for Lucy. Mike
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 06:24:34AM -0400, Michael McCandless wrote: >> > Maybe aggressive automatic data-reduction makes more sense in the context >> > of >> > "flexible matching", which is more expansive than "flexible scoring"? >> >> I think so. Maybe it shouldn't be called a Similarity (which to me >> (though, carrying a heavy curse of knowledge burden...) means >> "scoring")? Matcher? > > I think we can express the difference between your proposed approach for > Lucene Similarity (no effect on index) and my proposed approach for Lucy > Similarity (aggressive index-time data reduction) by putting Lucy's Similarity > under Lucy::Index instead of Lucy::Search. > > Marvin Humphrey > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
