[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854885#action_12854885
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2074:
------------------------------------
Uwe, must this be coupled with that issue? This one waits for a long time (why?
for JFlex 1.5 release?) and protecting against a huge buffer allocation can be
a real quick and tiny fix. And this one also focuses on getting Unicode 5 to
work, which is unrelated to the buffer size. But the buffer size is not a
critical issue either that we need to move fast with it ... so it's your call.
Just thought they are two unrelated problems.
> Use a separate JFlex generated Unicode 4 by Java 5 compatible
> StandardTokenizer
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Uwe Schindler
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: jflex-1.4.1-vs-1.5-snapshot.diff, jflexwarning.patch,
> LUCENE-2074-lucene30.patch, LUCENE-2074.patch, LUCENE-2074.patch,
> LUCENE-2074.patch, LUCENE-2074.patch, LUCENE-2074.patch, LUCENE-2074.patch,
> LUCENE-2074.patch
>
>
> The current trunk version of StandardTokenizerImpl was generated by Java 1.4
> (according to the warning). In Java 3.0 we switch to Java 1.5, so we should
> regenerate the file.
> After regeneration the Tokenizer behaves different for some characters.
> Because of that we should only use the new TokenizerImpl when
> Version.LUCENE_30 or LUCENE_31 is used as matchVersion.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
