>>>>> "A" == A KLOS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A> ---------- | From: Daniel.Le.Berre / mime, , ,
A> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: java-linux / mime, , ,
A> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: JDK 1.1.3 + Swing
A> 1.0.1 is slow : why ? | Date: Friday, July 03, 1998 9:52AM | |
A> | Hi, | | I'm using JDK 1.1.3 on my linux box (RH 4.2), with
A> Swing 1.0.1.
A> Im am using Swing 1.0.2.......
I've updated to 1.0.2 under Solaris and I don't have noticed a signicative
difference.
A> | (I 've only installed the JDK 1.1.3 rpm coming from Suse 5.2)
A> | | I use this version since I 've seen that earlier versions
A> had memory | problems, and that is the "stable" version of the
A> JDK. | | The problem is that Swing with this version of the
A> JDK is very slow. | Some person have mentionned here that
A> Swing was working perfectly under | linux, better than windows
A> : for me, it's the contrary ! What's wrong with my |
A> configuration ?
A> Which version of JDK do you use? Because JDK1.1.6 for Win32 has
A> got a JIT and use that one by default (unless you explicitly
A> disable the JIT with java -nojit...) JDK1.1.6v2 hasn't got a
A> JIT built in, but you could use one called TYA (v0.7:
A> http://www.dragon1.net/software/tya/) and takes only 50K.
A> It improves the speed quite a bit (aprox. 3 times faster), but
A> not as dramatically as the JIT that comes with JDK1.1.6 for
A> Win32 (symantec JIT).
I'm using JDK 1.1.5 + Win32 performance pack. I'll try JDK1.1.6
since it seems to be an enhanced update ;-=))))
(I develop mainly under Solaris, that's the reason why I'm not
up-to-date with windows JDK)
A> Furthermore TYA is not entirely stable yet, but is definitely
A> worth to try!
I'll try it soon.
A> | | Does the JDK 1.1.6v2 have enhanced graphic support ?
A> Don't know actually.....
An other question :
Is there a reason for graphic support not to be
under Linux JDK as efficient as windows JDK one ?
Daniel Le Berre
